If It Needs Explaining, It’s Not Ready

A Trend Desk take on why risky campaigns work when the brand world is built to take a hit.

In well-designed video games, you’re allowed to be reckless.

You can wander off the main quest, take unnecessary risks, and test strange decisions just to see what happens. Not because the game is careless, but because it’s been thought through. The world has logic. The map exists whether you’re looking at it or not. The rules don’t change just because you feel like experimenting.

They planned for you to explore, to break the rules.

That structure is what makes freedom possible.

Without that structure, boldness turns stupid.

Brand strategy works the same way, although it’s rarely talked about that way. Most people imagine strategy as something you point to: a roadmap or a set of slides that explain what the brand is doing and why. But it's more than that. It's about becoming the game master.

The one who defines the world before the player ever enters it. The one who decides what’s possible, what’s off-limits, and what happens when you push too far. Who decides how big the dragons are and how deep the chasms are. How many magic spells can you cast, and which are your strongest cards to fight off uncertainties.

A good brand strategy doesn’t tell you exactly what to say or how everything should look. It defines the conditions under which bold decisions make sense. It sets the logic of the world so creative work can take risks without collapsing the narrative.

Let me repeat that again,

It sets the logic of the brand world,

so the creative can exist freely.

Brands start over-explaining because they’re afraid of being misunderstood. They soften strong ideas mid-sentence. They add context where confidence should be. Not because the work is dangerous, but because there’s nothing behind it to absorb the reaction.

Fear creates noise.

Noise kills authority.

Strategy is what prevents that spiral. It gives brands a backbone, a sense that even if a message is challenged or a decision is questioned, the larger system still holds.

So, let's look at some bold, creative brand campaigns.

Nike — Dream Crazy (Colin Kaepernick)

Nike’s Colin Kaepernick “Dream Crazy” campaign was risky because it knowingly polarized the market — but it worked because the risk wasn’t a stunt, it was strategy. Nike has always positioned itself around athletes who push boundaries and challenge culture, so choosing Kaepernick wasn’t a sudden political pivot, it was the clearest expression of the brand’s long-held belief system.

 Burger King — Moldy Whopper

Burger King’s Moldy Whopper was risky because it deliberately did the one thing food brands refuse to do: show the product failing the beauty test. But it worked because the “gross” wasn’t the idea — the proof was. The strategy was simple and ruthless: if you want people to believe you removed preservatives, you don’t say it. You show it.

SickKids — VS

Most charity advertising leans on softness. SickKids (The Hospital for Sick Children Foundation in Toronto) went the other way: intensity, confrontation, fight. “VS” is risky because it rejects pity — and replaces it with momentum. Strategically, it reframes the hospital not as a place where tragedy happens, but as a high-performance institution going head-to-head with the impossible

Most brands don’t lack bold ideas. They lack the conditions that make boldness survivable. So the minute they touch something sharp — a risky line, a face, an uncomfortable truth — they start negotiating with it. They add disclaimers. They soften the point. They sand it down until it’s socially acceptable and strategically useless. Not because the audience is too sensitive.

So if you want bolder work, stop asking for braver creative. Ask for a better-built world. One with rules you don’t change mid-game. One where the brand doesn’t flinch when people misunderstand it. Because real strategy isn’t a deck. It’s the thing that lets you be reckless without getting lost.

Anyways. Im just wondering then... Does Sydney Sweeney really have great jeans?

Thank you for spending time at the Trend Desk